By Douglas V. Gibbs
The news has been coming at us so fast I can’t keep up with individual articles. So, this will be the first in a series of catch-up articles where I will tackle a large number of articles on particular subjects. Today’s subject is the SCAMDEMIC. Each one will begin with a link to the article I am discussing, followed by the pertinent information you need to know from the article, followed by my commentary in bold/italics.
The New York Times recently reported, “scientists who study aerosols, air flow and ventilation say that much of the time, the barriers don’t help and probably give people a false sense of security. And sometimes the barriers can make things worse.”
“Under normal conditions in stores, classrooms and offices, exhaled breath particles disperse, carried by air currents and, depending on the ventilation system, are replaced by fresh air roughly every 15 to 30 minutes. But erecting plastic barriers can change air flow in a room, disrupt normal ventilation and create “dead zones,” where viral aerosol particles can build up and become highly concentrated.
“A study published in June and led by researchers from Johns Hopkins, for example, showed that desk screens in classrooms were associated with an increased risk of coronavirus infection. In a Massachusetts school district, researchers found that plexiglass dividers with side walls in the main office were impeding air flow. A study looking at schools in Georgia found that desk barriers had little effect on the spread of the coronavirus compared with ventilation improvements and masking.
“Before the pandemic, a study published in 2014 found that office cubicle dividers were among the factors that may have contributed to disease transmission during a tuberculosis outbreak in Australia.
“British researchers have conducted modeling studies simulating what happens when a person on one side of a barrier — like a customer in a store — exhales particles while speaking or coughing under various ventilation conditions. The screen is more effective when the person coughs, because the larger particles have greater momentum and hit the barrier. But when a person speaks, the screen doesn’t trap the exhaled particles — which just float around it. While the store clerk may avoid an immediate and direct hit, the particles are still in the room, posing a risk to the clerk and others who may inhale the contaminated air.”
We know that masks are ineffective in stopping a virus (it actually says so on some of the packaging for masks, and doctors will tell you they wear them to stop droplets from their own body from dripping onto the patient, not to stop any viral transmission), and now we know that the plastic barriers actually made things worse.
Good thing COVID is actually much more minor than they’ve made it out to be because if it was deadlier on a wider scale, the policies of those who claim to want to protect us would have likely killed us all.
Whether you believe the hype about the pandemic, or not, the reality is that the arguments by the promoters of such are contradictory, and untrue, at best. This is just another example.
The “vaccine” (which isn’t a vaccine as much as it is a genetic manipulator) is experimental, at best. The Moderna Covid-19 “vaccine” contains 40 trillion mRNA molecules in each injection, distributing nearly all of them to other parts of the body, including vulnerable areas like the brain, heart, and lungs. The spike proteins created by the mRNA message then does its duty of reprogramming our immune system, but they are affecting other things, too. Blood clots are just one of the side effects that have led to permanent damage.
A new study by the Mayo Clinic found the Pfizer vaccine was only 42% effective against infection in July in the clinic’s home state of Minnesota, when the Delta variant became dominant.
In Florida, the risk of infection in July for people fully vaccinated with Moderna was about 60% lower than for people fully vaccinated with Pfizer.
“Scientists said it was time to accept that there was no way of stopping the virus spreading through the entire population, and monitoring people with mild symptoms was no longer helpful,” the British paper said.
Professor Andrew Pollard, who led the Oxford vaccine team, said it was clear that the delta variant could infect people who had been vaccinated.
That fact makes herd immunity impossible to reach even with high vaccine uptake, he said.
The “vaccine” is not about immunity, it is about genetic manipulation. As for herd immunity, let everyone get the disease and they will build more reliable immunities. For those of you screaming about how many would die if you let everyone get COVID, while I believe for some people it can be serious, and even life-threatening, for the vast majority of us it is a minor irritation at best with a better than 99% recovery rate. I am not going to risk getting a jab that is designed to screw with my God-given genetic perfection and it is said to be only 42% effective for a virus I have a better than 99% chance of surviving from, and a 6.72% times better immunity from if I should gain that natural immunity.
I am still trying to figure this one out. Evidence shows SM-102 is present in the “vaccine”, and that it is toxic to humans and animals, but some are saying it is just a conspiracy theory. While I believe the former, I have to consider at what point does it become toxic in the sense of “how much”. For example, there are many things that are toxic in large amounts, but in small amounts they do nothing to us.