By Douglas V. Gibbs
Mark Zuckerberg, best known as the guy behind Facebook, and his overall umbrella company called Meta, wrote a letter to Congressman Jim Jordan revealing what seemed to be regret for his part in a censorship ploy that he says in his letter was pushed by the Federal Government, and more specifically, the Biden Administration. According to the letter, former White House Assistant to the President and Director of Digital Strategy Rob Flaherty pushed the Facebook mogul and other Big Tech platforms like Google to censor speech the leftists in the government didn’t agree with. Now, Flaherty has resurfaced as Kamala Harris’ Deputy Campaign Manager. Meanwhile, the popularity of Trump and the unpopularity of the Democrats and their hard left policies that have left us in a dire economic situation which has some lefties nervous. What happens to those Democratic Party criminals who supported the unconstitutional scheme of the federal government colluding with social media to censor any dissent if Trump wins in November? What happens if their schemes are exposed? Will they end up in handcuffs and be carried off in orange jump suits? While perhaps such a scenario is more of a pipe dream than a down-the-road reality, Zuckerberg got nervous. The Trump Train may be too big to rig, and Zuckerberg may have felt like he had to hedge his bet just in case the GOP pulled off a big win by securing the White House and winning a majority in each House of Congress. He may also have considered that if the lefty game of fraud pulls it off as it did in 2020, and the Democrats win big with a dreaded trifecta, historically the activists that help tyranny reach the top is discarded. He may have realized that he is just a useful idiot, and if a potential Harris-Walz administration gains power, especially considering their communist leanings, and they have a Congress willing to goosestep along with them, their handling of freedom of speech through the social media will likely become more direct (communists believe in the government owning the means of production, fascists believe in controlling the means of production through heavy regulatory control)l. In that scenario Zuck would lose control of the company he created, and perhaps even lose ownership of it.
Then again, he may not be capable of thinking that deeply, or realizing that the tyranny he supports may turn against him if it gains complete power.
Zuckerberg may also have been looking at the economic end of it. The U.S. Dollar is in trouble. The attacks globalist actors have been launching, including the BRICS blitzkrieg, is a clear and present danger against the U.S. Dollar and America’s economic stability. If paper money loses its value and inflation becomes more insane, Zuckerberg may think he needs to make peace with either governmental regime to survive the coming wave of madness.
Or, his letter to Jim Jordan might have been a head fake. Act like you are moving one way, only to dart back the other way to score in an unexpected manner. Lefties, after all, are diabolical and you never know what evil they are willing to shoot with in their quest to kill America’s founding principles and lead America down the road to a system that fundamentally changes our constitutional foundation.
Either way, we are dealing with very devious actors. Be careful about getting excited when they open their mouths and their usual demonic hate for America doesn’t scream as loudly as possible. Remain skeptical when they actually sound, typically only for a moment, like they have half of a brain, and half of a soul. Remember who we are dealing with. Trust must be earned, and Zuckerberg has earned none. If given the chance, he would be willing to help drag his political opposition out of their homes Rwanda-style and kill them on their lawns.
They kill babies in the womb all the way up to the baby’s due date, and they support killing the elderly through assisted suicide schemes; why wouldn’t they be willing to kill in a manner we’ve seen over and over in history by people who believed in the same political madness that today’s liberal progressive leftwing Democrats believe?
In the end, the biggest part of this is the fact that while as a private company Facebook is allowed to have their own policies, and can decide who are their customers and how those customers may operate (you know, the ol’ “No Shoes, No Shirt, No Service” idea), the reality is that when big corporations, or any private entity, collude with government to censor speech it is a flagrant violation of the First Amendment. The Federal Government has no authority whatsoever to make law, or act in any manner, that may interfere with a person’s speech (or the freedom of the press) – even if they claim that it’s “misinformation” or “disinformation,” or anything else that may be considered dangerous by them to their power.
In fact, the reality is, questioning the government was the whole point of the First Amendment. Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press were specifically about religious and political speech, and the Freedom of Assembly and Freedom to Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances were specifically added to the First Amendment to secure the citizen’s right to question the government. The point of the First Amendment was to celebrate and secure the right to challenge those in power, not to allow them to quash anybody who dares to voice opposition.
— Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
