Media Lied for Hillary Clinton Regarding Trump Dossier

Hillary Clinton payed for the Russian Dossier used as an excuse for the Democrats to launch their Russian collusion accusations against the Trump campaign.  The dossier was filled with completely false information, but was structured in such a way that Democrat legal minds were able to feign that they were able to take it seriously … with a straight face.  Now, it is being revealed that the press corps of leftists assigned to the White House were fully aware that she paid for the dossier as early as September of 2016.  Yet, they suppressed the information and acted as if the salacious document was legit intel.

The biased liberal media knew that Hillary was the money behind the attack, and then hid that information because to reveal it was not beneficial to the ruse that was taking place – proving that the mainstream media is nothing more than an obedient tool – a lap dog – for the Democrats, the Deep State, and ultimately for the Marxists who have infiltrated our American System.

Furthermore, a number of prominent journalists admitted to the Trump campaign that they knew Hillary Clinton was behind the Russia dossier, yet they continued to report as if the salacious document was legit intelligence.

Paul Sperry tweeted:  “BREAKING: ex-Trump campaign adviser says prominent Washington journalists told him DURING CAMPAIGN (early as Sept 2016) they KNEW Hillary Clinton was behind the anti-Trump dossier, and yet they SAT ON that critical information for a FULL YEAR & acted as if dossier was legit intel”
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/949682646925434882 …   8:09 AM – Jan 7, 2018

They all knew, and they all lied to America because the Democrat Party’s narrative is more important than what is best for this country, or being honest to the American Public.

The only reason the information got out at all was because in mid-October, shortly before the election, The Washington Post decided to publish the information revealing Hillary Clinton’s camp paid for the dossier.  It was a surprise admission, in the least.

The New York Times tried to make the connections, as well, and put it out there, but Clinton’s campaign lawyer, Marc Elias, pushed back “vigorously” saying Times Reporter Kenneth Vogel’s sources were wrong.

When I tried to report this story, Clinton campaign lawyer @marceelias pushed back vigorously, saying “You (or your sources) are wrong.” https://twitter.com/kenvogel/status/922954944071852032 … 2:38 PM – Oct 24, 2017

Was the Hillary Clinton Campaign doing what they could to cover-up the presidential candidate’s involvement in the creation of a false dossier used to attack Trump, and hopefully (from their point of the view) dislodge him from any hopes of becoming President of the United States?

Gateway Pundit reports that another White House Correspondent for the New York Times, Maggie Haberman also blasted the lying Democrats over the debunked dossier when she tweeted, “Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year”

Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html …
3:07 PM – Oct 24, 2017

At the end of October, Hillary Clinton claimed she didn’t know about the Russia dossier, nor that her campaign actually paid for it, until after Buzzfeed published the 35-page document in January of 2017 laying out all of the information for all to see.

Like all players in the game of deception, there is no doubt in my mind that Hillary Clinton was fully aware about the dossier, just as she is aware that her inactions led to the deaths of Americans at Benghazi, just as she knew that her emails were classified, just as she knew she was lying when she dismissed a report by a newspaper that she was having séances in the White House to commune directly with Eleanor [Roosevelt]’s spirit, just as she knows she has done everything she can to keep you from knowing she received $675,000 from Goldman Sachs to speak, just as she knows her favors for donors in deals caused Andrew C. McCarthy to liken her State Department to “a racketeering enterprise.”

— Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary